Consideration was given to the report
of the Executive Director Corporate Services.
The Head of Treasury and Financial
Services introduced the report, which set out the
Affordable Housing
proposition in detail and recommended investment into the London
CIV Affordable Housing fund. It was noted that Committee Members had recently
attended a training session that focused on investment in
affordable housing.
Isio Investment Consultants,
Andrew Singh and Hermione Rigg, took the committee through the
report in detail, advising that the Committee had agreed a new
strategy in July 2022 and the report provided an outline of
Affordable Housing as a new asset class. Key points were made as
follows:
- Residential property was an
alternative to commercial property.
- Returns were designed to produce
income via rental payments and to increase capital
value.
- Returns were inflation linked
and offer diversification from traditional asset
classes.
- Investments in this type of fund
benefitted from being defensive and less economically
sensitive.
- There were some risks associated
with this investment type.
- The sub-fund would invest in the
CBRE UK Affordable Housing Fund and the Octopus Affordable Housing
Fund.
Responding to questions the Isio
Investment Consultant provided the following
information:
- Typically, with a new investment
of this type, there is a lag in early years due to lack of
established assets in the portfolio and investor capital was used
for development. As assets became operational, performance then
stabilised and improved. The CBRE fund was established in 2018 and
performance was broadly in line with expectations of a fund of that
age. Each development became less impactful as the fund
matured.
- Specific data on performance
would be provided to the Committee in writing.
- It was important to have a
balanced sub-fund. CBRE had established a portfolio of assets which
could provide a stabilised return, but it would take longer to
invest due to higher demand. Octopus, on the other hand, was a new
fund so had the benefit of being able to accept investments more
quickly.
- This type of fund had previously
been very London centric as this was where the demand was, so
returns were often higher when investing in this area.
- However, the market was
developing quickly, and opportunities for investment were
distributed across the country, and CBRE’s current investment
profile was roughly 30 – 40% in London, 20% - 30% in the
Southeast and the remainder was invested elsewhere.
- In terms of risks associated
with inflation linked income, it was noted that there was a
contractual obligation to increase rental charges in line with
inflation. However, when interest had reached 10 – 11% it was
not considered appropriate to raise rents this high, so a cap was
introduced but this was not considered to have an adverse impact on
the fund.
- It was in the Fund’s best
interest to ensure that properties were constructed and managed to
a high standard, due to the reputational risks involved with poorly
maintained properties.
- Roughly 60 – 70% of
residential properties within the fund would be newly built, and 30
– 40% of stock would be existing buildings that had been
retrofitted to meet current standards.
The Committee commented that
affordable housing was a positive investment and were pleased that
there was an increased focus on the social impacts of
investments.
Therefore, it was
RESOLVED
–
THAT the Committee:
i)
Agree that the Fund invest £97m in the London CIV affordable
housing sub-fund;
ii)
Agree that the funds invested with Partners Group are allowed to
mature;
iii)
Agree that any balance on the July 2023 Investment Strategy Review
is to come from the Legal and General Passive global portfolio;
and
iv)
Delegate all matters relating to this resolution to the Executive
Director Corporate Services.
ACTION BY: Executive Director Corporate Services