Report of the Executive Director Supporting Communities
This is an application for a new premises licence under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003.
Minutes:
Consideration was given to a report of the Executive Director Supporting Communities detailing an application for a new premises licence under Section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003.
Paru Bhudia, Licensing Officer, summarised the report.
The Panel agreed to admit the late papers included within the supplementary agenda.
Since the main agenda publication, the following additional conditions proposed by the Police had been agreed by the Applicant:
PC Rachel Aldis, Police responsible authority, spoke to their representation. The following concerns were raised: the premises was situated within a Cumulative Impact Area (CIA) and this premises did not demonstrate any exception to Camden’s Licensing Policy’s rebuttable presumption to refuse a new application, therefore granting this new licence would undermine the promotion of the licencing objectives; regardless of the proposed licence being limited to dry-sales, the premises could become a flashpoint for incidences involving people leaving other late night venues and staying in the area; and that despite the Applicant claiming that 20 TENs had been held without incidents, during this period there were no conditions requiring the premises to report incidents to the Police.
In response to questions, PC Rachel Aldis confirmed there had been no incidents of crime reported to the Police in relation to the premises during the period Wendy’s had been operating until 02:00hrs firstly without a licence and then the granted TENS which followed.
Esther Jones, Licensing Authority responsible authority, spoke to their representation. Esther Jones explained their objection was due to the premises being located in the CIA and the application should be refused on that basis.
Paul Newton, Wendy’s Regional Operations Manager, accompanied by
Michael Clarke, Wendy’s Managing Director U.K. & Europe, spoke to their application. The following points were made:
· It relation to the Licensing Authority’s representation, it was confirmed the Applicant had already accepted the proposed conditions relating to the women’s safety principles and retaining CCTV for 31 days. The premises already had three refuse areas across the floors which were regularly changed.
· As stated in proposed conditions 15-17, there would be security on the ground floor entrance and the first floor who would be present longer than the licensable activities took place. There were currently 13 security cameras in the interior of the premises, and Applicant was happy to install more to the exterior of the building if requested.
· It was confirmed that it was a mistake of the premises during the period this Wendy’s site was operating without a licence and trading until 02:00hrs. During that period of nearly 12 months, there had been no incidents (including antisocial behaviour) recorded internally or to the Police.
· As a business, Wendy’s wanted to be a part of the community and be an offering of late night refreshments. The premises wanted to prevent litter and did not want drunk people carrying alcohol into the venue. Wendy’s were willing to comply with everything reasonable to help the smooth running of the premises.
In response to questions, the following points were clarified:
· The premises had been trading since 22 April 2023 and during that period had been operating until 02:00hrs on Fridays and Saturdays. Once it was realised a licence was required, the premises applied for 10 Temporary Event Notices (TENs) for the same hours as previously operating.
· Wendy’s used a third-party company to electronically record incidents which escalated to a Risk Team based in the US who would then use the data to analyse themes of incidents promptly. There had been no incidents since the premises opened.
· It was confirmed that the premises had not contacted any local residents alongside the application, although they knew they made deliveries to local residents. Wendy’s worked with Streets Kitchen Camden (UK and Ireland grassroots group who organised food kitchens for the homeless community) who were located opposite the premises. Wendy’s tended to donate food rather than cups to prevent litter.
· In relation to truck deliveries to the restaurant, it was confirmed that there were four food and drink deliveries per week which all took place overnight and were delivered by a third-party through a side door to inside of the restaurant.
· In relation to current system of refuse, it was confirmed the refuse was taken outside and collected between 05:00-06.30hrs everyday. External refuse was stored in separate wheelie bins (food waste, recycling and general waste) and was not left in plastic bags on the street.
· To mange rubbish in the immediate area, it was confirmed that staff litter picked outside of the restaurant and they were happy to increase the frequency of inspections. Within the restaurant, dining customers used trays and tended to dispose of their own rubbish in one of the two bins upstairs or one bin downstairs which were regularly emptied.
· There was no seating on the ground floor.
In their closing remarks, PC Rachel Aldis stated that granting this licence would increase the cumulative impact of licensed premises in the CIA and would result in additional pressure on resources for the Police and other authorities. In their view there was no evidence to show this premises should be an exemption to Cadmen’s Licensing Policy.
In their closing remarks, Esther Jones stated that if the Panel were minded to grant the application, further litter picking policies should be considered when considering the warmer months of the year.
Decision and Reasons
In their deliberations, Panel Members acknowledge that the premises was located in a CIA and the application engaged the crime and disorder and public nuisance objectives. The area was a sensitive to location in the borough for licenced venues, particularly as it was located next to a tube station. By reducing current proposed late-night hours on Friday and Saturday nights, the risk would be reduced of negatively impacting the licencing objectives and straining the resources of responsible authorities.
Panel Members understood the venues reluctance to reduce their operation to framework hours and acknowledged that the Applicant had agreed nearly all of the conditions proposed by responsible authorities and seemed to be willing to work with Licensing Officers improve their operation. Panel Members were reassured that the venue had operated without incidences during their TENs and since operating in Camden.
The Panel did not not want to impose additional waste and delivery conditions because the current system seemed to operate well and there had not been any complaints.
Panel Members advised the venue to converse with local residents going forward. The premises could apply for extended hours at a later date when they could evidence responsible operation with a licence terminating at 01:00hrs on Friday and Saturday nights.
RESOLVED –
i) THAT a licence be granted for:
a)
23:00 – 00:00 Sunday to Thursday
23:00 – 01:00 Friday to Saturday
b)
08:00 – 00:00 Sunday to Thursday
08:00 – 01:00 Friday to Saturday
ii) THAT the following conditions be added to the licence:
Conditions consistent with the operating schedule
a) all crimes reported to the venue.
b) all ejections of patrons.
c) any incidents of disorder and violence
d) all seizures of drugs or offensive weapons
e) any faults in the CCTV system or searching equipment or scanning equipment.
f) any refusal of the sale of alcohol to include date, time, and staff member.
g) any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service.
ACTON BY: Executive Director Supporting Communities
Supporting documents: